پژوهش های ادبی و بلاغی; پژوهش; ادبیات; بلاغت;
عنوان مقاله [English]
rogue is among words that in theosophical literature has a lot of usage, as yet a lot of writters and poets, had probed in this field. This word among theosophist poets had a different usage. Sometimes have been used in negative and sometimes in positive way. rogue means "amative" is the opposite of asceticism and devout and name, disillusionment and disgust, shrewd, uninhibited slovenly used among poems of poets. The aim of this issue is showing the usage of rogue, among eminent poems, like: Sadi, Hafez, Attar, Sanaei, Khajoye kermani and check the metamorphosis means of rogue in theosophical literature. By studing of poems and theosophists books, we can note the deepness of metamorphosis and semantic diffrences of "rogue" word from poets point of view. Without doubt with comparision of different semantic meaning o The aim of this research is to show the use of the term “rogue” among great poets like Sanā'ī,Attar, Khwaju Kermani, Sa’adi and Hafez, and to investigate the conceptual change of the termin mystical literature. According to the present article the term had a positive load in the secondperiod in Persian texts and introduced the characteristics of a perfect human with attributes ofloving, moaning and piety. In Sa’adi’s Golestan and Boostan “rogue” has a negative face, buttakes a positive face in Ghazaliat. Attar considers the rogue holy and bibulous. In the third periodrogue has a negative concept. After Hafez, it was attributed to opportunist, cunning and deceitfulone.