Abstract Mythological narrative nations because the archetypal foundations and Rooted in human unconscious, the stories are not unrelated to each other but there are a close relationship between these Mythology. Different races can be caused by time and Specific geography has different received from a true mythic, that it would be compatible with the theory of intertextuality. Using the theory of intertextuality you can get deeper into the text, which was formed based on myths. According to this theory, no text is not independent of the other and any text intertextual the previous text. The study utilizes a descriptive – analytical the purpose of representation and expression of the common features between the two versions of the myth of resurrection plant in Iran and Egypt) Keykhosro and Hores), according to the theory of intertextuality The results obtained in the two versions share the same characteristics and are similar in many ways . In this way, “How birth and Nurturing”, “Relation to Sun”, “The existence of the goddess of fertility”, “The enemy and Terminator”, “Resurrection and revenge” and “Assist the Dead” is the joint propositions between the two versions. The outcomes of this research Analysis of these features to achieve is intertextuality between the two versions.
ghobadi, H., & fathi, Z. (2015). Intertextual analysis resurrection plant in Iran and Egypt mythology
)Case study: Keykhosro and Hores). Literary and rhetorical research, 3(2), 9-22.
MLA
hoseinali ghobadi; zahra fathi. "Intertextual analysis resurrection plant in Iran and Egypt mythology
)Case study: Keykhosro and Hores)". Literary and rhetorical research, 3, 2, 2015, 9-22.
HARVARD
ghobadi, H., fathi, Z. (2015). 'Intertextual analysis resurrection plant in Iran and Egypt mythology
)Case study: Keykhosro and Hores)', Literary and rhetorical research, 3(2), pp. 9-22.
VANCOUVER
ghobadi, H., fathi, Z. Intertextual analysis resurrection plant in Iran and Egypt mythology
)Case study: Keykhosro and Hores). Literary and rhetorical research, 2015; 3(2): 9-22.
)